dual boot - Win XP and Red Hat 9

This is a discussion about dual boot - Win XP and Red Hat 9 in the Everything Linux category; Hi, Sorry about the subject line which must have appeared several times, but I'm new to Linux and wanted to confirm before proceeding with installation. Is it ok to have a dual boot system having the structure: 100 MB /boot 15GB Win XP 20GB FAT32(accessible to Win & Linux) 1GB Linux Swap (my RAM is 512MB) 10 GB /ho ...

Everything Linux 1800 This topic was started by , . Last reply by ,


data/avatar/default/avatar34.webp

2 Posts
Location -
Joined 2004-08-01
Hi,
 
Sorry about the subject line which must have appeared several times, but I'm new to Linux and wanted to confirm before proceeding with installation. Is it ok to have a dual boot system having the structure:
100 MB ---- /boot
15GB ---- Win XP
20GB ---- FAT32(accessible to Win & Linux)
1GB ---- Linux Swap (my RAM is 512MB)
10 GB ---- /home
 
Then, install grub in the first sector of /boot. I have mostly seen people recommending having Win as the first partition.
 
Thanks

Participate in our website and join the conversation

You already have an account on our website? To log in, use the link provided below.
Login
Create a new user account. Registration is free and takes only a few seconds.
Register
This subject has been archived. New comments and votes cannot be submitted.
Aug 1
Created
Aug 1
Last Response
0
Likes
5 minutes
Read Time
User User User User
Users

Responses to this topic


data/avatar/default/avatar04.webp

1678 Posts
Location -
Joined 2003-09-27
I would definately put XP first. You also are not showing a "/" partition. Here would be my suggestion:
 
 
15 GB ---- Win XP
10 GB ---- FAT32(accessible to Win & Linux)
100 MB ---- /boot
10 GB ---- /
1GB ---- Linux Swap
10 GB ---- /home
 
Do you really need your fat32 partition that large? Depending of course, I would think 5 GB would be a gracious plenty. Then you can divide the other 5 GB between / and /home...
 
15 GB ---- Win XP
5 GB ---- FAT32(accessible to Win & Linux)
100 MB ---- /boot
12.5 GB ---- /
1GB ---- Linux Swap
12.5 GB ---- /home
 
Unless you are using apps that need massive amounts of memory, you really don't even need the swap partition. I also have 512 MB, and my machine is noticably faster without a swap.
 
Just my two cents worth: Go with Fedora Core 1. with the updates, it's a big improvement over "9."

data/avatar/default/avatar34.webp

2 Posts
Location -
Joined 2004-08-01
OP
Thanks! Guess I'll move Win XP to the beginning. But since my Win partition is 15GB, the /boot will be beyond the 1024 cyl limit. Will that affect the grub management? Once I set everything up to run smoothly, I plan to have Win boot loader manage the start up.
 
Another thing I was not clear about - Is it better to have the grub in the MBR or in the first sector of /boot?? I have come across posts that say both are ok. Any pros and cons to either?
 
==================
 
Originally posted by Dapper Dan:

Quote:I would definately put XP first. You also are not showing a "/" partition. Here would be my suggestion: 
 
15 GB ---- Win XP
10 GB ---- FAT32(accessible to Win & Linux)
100 MB ---- /boot
10 GB ---- /
1GB ---- Linux Swap
10 GB ---- /home
 
Do you really need your fat32 partition that large? Depending of course, I would think 5 GB would be a gracious plenty. Then you can divide the other 5 GB between / and /home...
 
15 GB ---- Win XP
5 GB ---- FAT32(accessible to Win & Linux)
100 MB ---- /boot
12.5 GB ---- /
1GB ---- Linux Swap
12.5 GB ---- /home
 
Unless you are using apps that need massive amounts of memory, you really don't even need the swap partition. I also have 512 MB, and my machine is noticably faster without a swap.
 
Just my two cents worth: Go with Fedora Core 1. with the updates, it's a big improvement over "9."
 

data/avatar/default/avatar04.webp

1678 Posts
Location -
Joined 2003-09-27
I'm not familiar with Win boot loader. If that by chance means you are thinking of using boot magic that comes with Partition Magic, please stop now! Boot magic is a piece of garbage! I would strongly urge you to use grub as your boot manager. Also, I've had much better luck installing grub at first sector than at the MBR. Just my personal preference though. If your machine is fairly new, the 1024 barrier shouldn't be an issue.
 
I would get XP up and operational first, then move on to Linux. If for some reason you mess up the install to where grup won't work, Just put the install cd's back in as an upgrade, and when prompted, write an entirely new grub boot scenario.
 
Be sure to create an XP boot floppy, and also a Linux boot floppy when prompted to do so. It can be a life saver to have an operational Linux OS from which to correct problems.
 
Good Luck, and let us know if you need further help.

data/avatar/default/avatar10.webp

2895 Posts
Location -
Joined 2002-08-30
If you are referring to the boot.ini file for XP, it can be done, but as Dan said, it's much easier using grub. As Dan also said, if you are looking to modify a 3rd party boot manager, such as Boot Magic, expect some issues.

data/avatar/default/avatar32.webp

45 Posts
Location -
Joined 2004-06-11
Hi
 
Maybe I can help someone .
 
Here is how I have done it on my system:
 
-15GB WindowsXP :copyright: drive formatted to FAT32 for access from linux
-25GB for the linux installation.
-Other system partitions to their default values.
 
 
This is EXACTLY how I got my dual boot system (It is pretty straightforward).
 
-Insert WinXP CD and boot.
- Start an installing and when you get to formatting options do the following:
 
>Delete existing data partitions.
>Create a new partition from the unpartioned space (using ONLY the space what you want WindowsXP partition to take up)
>Format the drive as FAT32 (so you can mount the windows drive from linux for access).
 
-Once WinXP is installed insert the RedHat9 CD and reboot.
-Install linux in the remaining unpartitioned space.
-Configure the boot loader (I use GRUB)
 
Hope this helps.
 
Koba