Linux Compatible
  • News
    • Channels
    • Archive
    • Search
    • Submit
  • Articles
    • Categories
  • Knowledgebase
  • Compatibility
    • Search
  • Links
  • Forums
  • Twitter
Advertisement

Latest News
[ Windows | Linux | Apple ]

· GeForce 418.91 Driver Performance Analysis and more
· Geary 0.13.0 released
· Tiff and Mosquitto Updates for Debian
· Docker Update for openSUSE
· Debian GNU/Linux 9.8 released
· PHP and Thunderbird Updates for Debian
· Wine Staging 4.2 released
· How to Install Full Windows 10 on a Raspberry Pi and more
· Firefox-ESR Security Update for Debian 8 LTS
· Iscsi-initiator-utils Bug Fix Update for Oracle Linux 6

Linux Compatibility
· Brother DCP-L2540DN
· Sound Blaster E5
· WD Elements 500GB external hard drive
· Canon D660U Flatbad scanner
· Umax Astra 4500 USB Scanner
· Logitech QuickCam Pro 4000
· Dell Latitude E6420
· Creative Sound Blaster Z
· Photosmart 5520
· TB-5300 Slimline Design Tablet

New Forum Topics
· Dale
by: Dale Blinco
on: 2018-02-05 00:26
1 replies, 4010 views

· modem driver needed
by: jongiffen777
on: 2017-12-13 11:11
1 replies, 5736 views

· Need a decent browser for XP Pro!
by: percy
on: 2017-12-05 11:02
2 replies, 7158 views

· Comodo Time Machine + Faronics Deep Freeze
by: Jabberwocky
on: 2017-11-15 23:17
1 replies, 5676 views

· Linux compatablity
by: ibme
on: 2017-10-04 18:05
1 replies, 7608 views

News Channels
· Drivers
· Guides
· Reviews
· Security
· Software
· Press Release
· Updates
· Interviews
· Linux
· General
· Debian
· Red Hat
· Slackware
· Gentoo
· Mandriva
· White Box
· SUSE
· GNOME
· KDE
· CentOS
· Ubuntu
· MEPIS
· Android
· Oracle Linux
· Arch Linux

What's New
Login to see an overview of all news stories since your last visit.

Welcome to our website

To take full advantage of all features you need to login or register. Registration is completely free and takes only a few seconds.

Linux Compatible » News » November 2010 » Intel Windows vs. Linux GPU Performance Q4'2010

Intel Windows vs. Linux GPU Performance Q4'2010

Posted by Philipp Esselbach on: 11/23/2010 02:38 PM [ Print | 0 comment(s) ]

Phoronix compared the GPU performance of Windows and Linux




Yesterday we shared benchmarks of the ATI R600 Gallium3D driver compared against the classic Mesa R600 driver and then the proprietary AMD Catalyst driver. The proprietary driver was much faster than the open-source drivers were, but the Gallium3D driver did possess higher performance in most of the tests than with the classic Mesa driver. This is similar to the R300 Gallium3D driver being faster than its now-deprecated R300 classic driver. Meanwhile though Intel continues to back only their classic Mesa DRI driver and there are no signs of them switching over to the Gallium3D architecture anytime soon. It is not as if Intel's current Mesa driver is feature-complete and performance-optimized as our tests from earlier this year show Intel's Linux graphics performance being far behind their Windows driver. In this article though we are seeing where the Intel Mesa performance is at when using the very latest DRM and Mesa code.


Intel Windows vs. Linux GPU Performance Q4'2010

« Powercolor HD6870 PCS+ Review · AMD Athlon II X4 645, AMD Phenom II X4 970, AMD Phenom II X6 1075T Review »

Linux Compatible » News » November 2010 » Intel Windows vs. Linux GPU Performance Q4'2010
All products mentioned are registered trademarks or trademarks of their respective owners.
© 2002-2018 Esselbach Internet Solutions - All Rights Reserved. Terms and privacy policy
Powered by Contentteller® Business Edition