<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="0.92">
	<channel>
		<title>Linux Compatible</title>
		<link>http://www.linuxcompatible.org/index.php</link>
		<description>Last 20 items on Linux Compatible</description>
		<generator>Esselbach Storyteller CMS System</generator>

		<item>
			<title>Fedora Core 2</title>
			<link>http://www.linuxcompatible.org/review.php?id=14</link>
			<description>Fedora Core 2 is the latest release of Red Hat's community supported Linux distribution. This release is available on 4 CDs (+ 4 CDs sources) or 1 DVD, and for x86-compatible (32-bit) and AMD64 (64-bit) platforms.</description>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>A first look at Progeny Debian 2.0</title>
			<link>http://www.linuxcompatible.org/review.php?id=13</link>
			<description>Componentized Linux by Progeny is a new kind of Linux distribution, built as a set of interchangeable parts. The core component is an LSB 1.3 certified Linux runtime.</description>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Mepis on ICE</title>
			<link>http://www.linuxcompatible.org/review.php?id=12</link>
			<description>After all the fooling around with KDE, and Gnome, and all of the other minimalist desktops, I keep coming back to iceWM. I know of a number of people who are using iceWM but it's certainly not as popular as Gnome or KDE. So why would iceWM continue to be my desktop of choice?</description>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Gnoppix and the Gnome 2.4 desktop</title>
			<link>http://www.linuxcompatible.org/review.php?id=11</link>
			<description>I've been running on Mepis/Debian with the KDE and more recently the iceWM desktops. Lately I've been using a lot more Gnome apps. In many cases these seem to be more functional than their KDE equivalents, and, I started hearing that Gnome had improved considerably. When I heard that Gnoppix was a bootable Debian with a Gnome 2.4 desktop, I just had to try the new rc2 release.</description>
		</item>

	</channel>
</rss>