Welcome to our website
To take full advantage of all features you need to login or register. Registration is completely free and takes only a few seconds.
Gallium3D vs. Classic Mesa vs. Catalyst (Driver Comparison)
Posted by Philipp Esselbach on: 05/04/2011 09:41 AM [ Print | 0 comment(s) ]
Phoronix compared the Gallium3D, Classic Mesa, and Catalyst drivers under Linux
The open-source graphics driver landscape is ever changing with new work going into Mesa / Gallium3D near daily. While many improvements have been made in recent time, the open-source drivers have a ways to go in competing with the proprietary competition. Even the open-source AMD driver, which is developed using documentation from AMD as well as code and engineering resources within the company, it has a tough time competing with the well-optimized Catalyst driver. Fortunately, the AMD driver is now largely centered on the two Gallium3D drivers: R300g and R600g, and have pushed away their classic Mesa DRI drivers into maintenance mode. The R300g supports the R300 through R500 ASICs (up through the Radeon X1000 series) while the R600g driver supports all ATI/AMD hardware past that point up through the latest Radeon HD 6000 series and Fusion. In this article, we are seeing where the performance is currently at for the classic Mesa, Gallium3D, and Catalyst drivers under Linux.
Gallium3D vs. Classic Mesa vs. Catalyst (Driver Comparison)
